Background
The Supreme Court of Western Australia recently considered an unusual situation, the first of its kind in Australia. The case involved Brent Mack who, in 2012, had been convicted of his mother’s murder and is currently serving a lengthy custodial sentence. At the time of his conviction, the judge found that his main motive was access to his mother’s money. Ms Mack left no Will, so under the State’s intestacy laws, her estate would normally go to her two sons equally, meaning Brent and his brother Adrian Mack would benefit. However, under the Rule of Forfeiture a person cannot benefit from an estate where they are responsible for the death, and so Brent forfeited his share. The Forfeiture Rule is based on the principle that it is against public policy to allow a criminal to claim a benefit by virtue of his or her crime.